Congratulations to Ivan at St Bede’s Inter-church School, Vedant Joshi, and Rayyan Ansari at Goldington Academy for solving this problem!
(i) Since ,
By the cosine rule, and hence . Substituting this into the above expression for gives .
(ii)
So and hence .
(iii) If the area is maximized for a given perimeter , then must also be maximized since is fixed. Since , and hence . Now and can vary without changing the perimeter , so must be maximized as varies.
Thus must be maximized as varies with and fixed ( can’t be negative as no side length can be greater than half the perimeter). This is a quadratic in with a maximum turning point, which must be half-way between the roots and . So for to be maximized, we must have and hence , which implies that .
Then by symmetry (it doesn’t matter which sides’ lengths are called and ), we must also have and hence , so the triangle must be equilateral.
The most common approach to part (iii) was to use the AM-GM inequality to show that an equilateral triangle has an area greater than or equal to any other triangle of the same perimeter, but nobody taking this approach proved that the inequality is strict. This could be done by using the fact that if and only if all numbers in the list are equal.